PEEK Polymers vs Metals: A Comprehensive Comparison for Material Selection

Material selection plays a critical role in various industries. 

Material selection plays a critical role in various industries, from the electronics / semiconductor industry to medical devices, as the performance and longevity of products heavily depend on the materials used in their construction. Two common materials found in these applications are PEEK (polyether ether ketone) polymers and metals. This article aims to provide a comprehensive comparison between PEEK polymers and metals, examining factors such as mechanical properties, manufacturing processes, cost considerations, environmental impact, and industry-specific applications.

Material Properties

In the world of engineering and manufacturing, material selection is a critical factor that influences the success and longevity of a project or product. PEEK polymers and metals are two widely used materials, each offering unique properties and advantages that make them suitable for various applications. PEEK, or polyether ether ketone, is a high-performance thermoplastic known for its exceptional mechanical, thermal, and chemical properties. On the other hand, metals encompass a broad range of materials, including steel, aluminum, and titanium, with diverse characteristics depending on the specific alloy and treatment.

Understanding the key differences in material properties between PEEK polymers and metals is essential for engineers, designers, and decision-makers to make informed choices when selecting materials for their projects.

Read our overview to get you started with this high performance polymer

Read all our guides and information how to start printing with PEEK high performance polymers. 

Mechanical Properties

PEEK polymers are known for their excellent strength-to-weight ratio, with tensile strength comparable to metals such as aluminum and stainless steel. They offer high elongation, impact resistance, and fatigue resistance, making them suitable for demanding applications. Metals, on the other hand, exhibit a wide range of mechanical properties depending on the specific alloy, allowing for tailored solutions to meet specific requirements.

Thermal Properties

PEEK polymers exhibit low thermal conductivity, which makes them ideal for insulating applications. They also demonstrate high heat resistance, with a continuous service temperature of up to 260°C. Metals, in contrast, generally have higher thermal conductivity and can handle a broader range of temperatures depending on the alloy used.

Chemical Resistance

PEEK polymers are highly resistant to various chemicals, solvents, and corrosive environments, which make them suitable for applications in the chemical and pharmaceutical industries. Metals vary in their chemical resistance, with some alloys being more resistant to corrosion and chemical attack than others.

Electrical Properties

PEEK polymers are excellent electrical insulators, with low electrical conductivity and high dielectric strength. Metals, by nature, are conductive materials, making them unsuitable for electrical insulation applications but ideal for use in electrical components and wiring systems.

Rewatch our webinar: Learn how to replace metal parts with 3D printed functional PEEK Polymer parts

3D Printed Cooling Manifold for the electronics and semiconductor industryAs many industries become increasingly aware of the benefits of metal-to-plastic conversion, 3D-printing is quickly becoming the method of choice for part manufacturing.

Processing and Manufacturing

When choosing a material for an engineering application, it is important to consider not only the material properties but also the processing and manufacturing techniques involved. PEEK polymers and metals are two popular material choices, each offering unique advantages in various industries.

The processing and manufacturing of PEEK polymers and metals differ significantly, which can impact the ease of fabrication, production costs, and overall efficiency. PEEK polymers are typically processed using injection molding or extrusion, which allows for the creation of complex part geometries and consistent repeatability. Metals can be processed through a variety of methods, such as casting, forging, and machining, providing flexibility in part design and manufacturing.

Fabrication Methods

Fabrication methods

PEEK polymers are typically processed using injection molding or extrusion, which allows for complex part geometries and excellent repeatability. Metals can be processed using various methods, including casting, forging, and machining, providing flexibility in part design and manufacturing.


PEEK polymers are relatively easy to machine, with lower cutting forces and reduced tool wear compared to metals. Metals can vary in their machinability, with some alloys being more difficult to machine than others.

Joining Techniques

Joining techniques

PEEK polymers can be joined using adhesive bonding or welding techniques, such as ultrasonic welding. Metals can be joined using a variety of methods, including welding, brazing, and mechanical fasteners.

Cost Considerations

Selecting the right material for a specific application is a critical decision in various industries, and cost considerations play a significant role in the material selection process.

Material Costs

Material cost

PEEK polymers are generally more expensive than metals on a per-unit basis. However, the specific cost of each material depends on factors such as grade, alloy, and market conditions.

Manufacturing Cost

Manufacturing cost

The processing and fabrication costs for PEEK polymers can be higher than those for metals, particularly if specialized equipment or tooling is required. However, the lower weight of PEEK components may offset this cost by reducing shipping and handling expenses.

Lifecycle cost

Lifecycle cost

PEEK polymers typically have lower maintenance and replacement costs than metals, thanks to their high resistance to wear, corrosion, and chemical attack. Additionally, their lower weight can result in reduced energy consumption and environmental impact over the material’s lifecycle.

Critical parts & components made from PEEK. Printed by Bond3D

Static MixerDiscover our 3D printed PEEK parts and components for every industry: electronics / semiconductor, energy, high-tech industry, medical, aerospace or automotive.

Environmental Impact and Sustainability

In today’s increasingly environmentally conscious world, understanding the environmental impact and sustainability of materials used in various industries is crucial.

The environmental impact and sustainability of PEEK polymers and metals should be considered throughout their entire lifecycle, from production and processing to recycling and disposal. Factors such as energy consumption, recyclability, and carbon footprint are critical in assessing the overall environmental footprint of these materials.

Energy consumption

Energy consumption

The production of PEEK polymers generally requires less energy than that of metals, resulting in a lower environmental impact. PEEK polymers are processed using methods such as injection molding and extrusion, which are typically more energy-efficient than metal production techniques like casting, forging, and machining. However, it is important to consider the energy required for processing and recycling each material, as these factors can also contribute to the overall environmental impact.



Both PEEK polymers and metals can be recycled, but the availability of recycling facilities and the ease of recycling differ depending on the material and location. Metals are generally more widely recycled than PEEK polymers, thanks to the existing infrastructure for metal recycling and the established market for recycled metals. PEEK polymers can be recycled through mechanical or chemical methods, but the infrastructure for recycling PEEK is less developed compared to metals. This may result in a higher proportion of PEEK waste ending up in landfills or incinerators. However, advances in recycling technology and an increased focus on circular economy principles are expected to improve the recyclability of PEEK polymers in the future.

Carbon footprint

Carbon footprint

The carbon footprint of PEEK polymers and metals varies throughout their lifecycle, from production to disposal. PEEK polymers generally have a lower carbon footprint than metals during production due to their lower energy consumption. However, the carbon emissions associated with the transportation and processing of PEEK polymers may offset some of these advantages, depending on the specific supply chain and manufacturing processes involved.

Metals, on the other hand, tend to have a higher carbon footprint during production, particularly for energy-intensive processes like smelting and refining. The carbon emissions from metal production can be reduced through the use of renewable energy sources and more efficient production methods. Additionally, recycling metals can significantly lower their overall carbon footprint, as recycling typically requires less energy than primary production.

Applications and industry-specific considerations

In the selection of materials for various applications and industries, both PEEK polymers and metals offer unique advantages that make them suitable for specific purposes. Understanding the distinct benefits and limitations of each material in different industry contexts can help engineers and decision-makers choose the most appropriate material for their needs. Performance characteristics, regulatory requirements, and long-term durability are some factors that should be taken into account when comparing PEEK polymers and metals in industry-specific applications.

PEEK polymers are particularly valued in the medical industry due to their biocompatibility, chemical resistance, and sterilization compatibility. PEEK’s ability to withstand high temperatures and maintain its mechanical properties makes it ideal for medical implants, such as spinal fusion devices and orthopedic implants, where metal alternatives may be prone to corrosion or cause issues related to metal sensitivity. In the aerospace and automotive sectors, the lightweight nature of PEEK polymers contributes to fuel savings and reduced emissions, as well as easier handling and assembly. The material’s excellent strength-to-weight ratio and resistance to harsh environments make it suitable for use in high-performance components, such as gears, bearings, and seals, where traditional metals may face challenges related to weight and wear.

On the other hand, metals have a long history of use in various industries and have established themselves as reliable and versatile materials. For instance, in the construction and infrastructure sectors, metals such as steel and aluminum are often preferred for their high strength, durability, and recyclability. These characteristics make metals suitable for long-lasting infrastructure projects, contributing to reduced waste and a more sustainable built environment. In the electronics industry, metals like copper and gold provide excellent electrical conductivity and reliability in applications such as wiring systems, connectors, and circuit boards, where PEEK polymers’ insulating properties may not be desirable.


In conclusion, the comparison between PEEK polymers and metals highlights the unique advantages and limitations of each material in various aspects, including mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties, as well as processing, manufacturing, cost, and environmental considerations. While PEEK polymers offer excellent strength-to-weight ratio, chemical resistance, and insulating properties, metals provide a diverse range of characteristics depending on the specific alloy and treatment, often excelling in strength, thermal conductivity, and electrical conductivity.

When selecting materials for engineering projects, it is essential to consider the specific application, project requirements, and overall objectives. In many cases, PEEK polymers may be the preferred choice due to their high performance, lightweight nature, and lower environmental impact, offering unique benefits in industries such as electronics / semiconductor, energy, aerospace, automotive, and medical applications. However, it is crucial to evaluate the suitability of PEEK polymers on a case-by-case basis, as certain applications may still require the use of metals for their specific properties and characteristics.

To make the most informed decision when selecting materials, it is highly recommended to consult with materials engineers and industry experts who can provide guidance based on their experience and knowledge of PEEK polymers and metals. By carefully considering the unique advantages and limitations of each material and seeking expert advice, engineers and decision-makers can confidently choose the ideal material to meet their project requirements and contribute to a more sustainable and efficient future.

Ready to start printing with PEEK polymers?

Spinal CageCurious to know more about how PEEK polymers can be a value in your industry? Contact our team!

Overview of comparison of PEEK polymers versus metal (stainless steel)

Property/Aspect PEEK Polymers Metals
Mechanical Properties High strength-to-weight ratio
Excellent elongation, impact resistance
High fatigue resistance
Wide range of properties depending on the alloy
Thermal Properties Low thermal conductivity
High heat resistance (up to 260°C)
High thermal conductivity (varies by alloy)
Broad range of temperature resistance
Chemical Resistance Highly resistant to chemicals and corrosive environments Varies depending on the alloy and treatment
Electrical Properties Excellent electrical insulator
Low electrical conductivity
High dielectric strength
Conductive (unsuitable for insulation)
Fabrication Methods Injection molding, extrusion Casting, forging, machining
Machinability Relatively easy to machine
Lower cutting forces, reduced tool wear
Varies depending on the alloy
Joining Techniques Adhesive bonding, ultrasonic welding Welding, brazing, mechanical fasteners
Material Cost Generally more expensive than metals Varies depending on grade, alloy, market conditions
Manufacturing Cost Can be higher due to specialized equipment Generally lower
Lifecycle Cost Lower maintenance, replacement costs
Reduced energy consumption, environmental impact
Higher maintenance, replacement costs
Energy Consumption (Production) Lower energy consumption Higher energy consumption
Recyclability Less developed infrastructure for recycling
Recyclable through mechanical or chemical methods
Widely recycled, established infrastructure
Energy-efficient recycling processes
Carbon Footprint Lower carbon footprint during production
Transportation and processing may offset some advantages
Higher carbon footprint during production
Recycling can significantly lower overall carbon footprint
Share on

Talk to us

We believe transforming manufacturing is a team effort. Let’s get in touch and discuss how we can help you take the next step.